Current:Home > MySupreme Court seems ready to deny trademark for 'Trump Too Small' T-shirts-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Supreme Court seems ready to deny trademark for 'Trump Too Small' T-shirts
View Date:2024-12-23 23:55:03
Donald Trump finally got to the Supreme Court on Wednesday. Indirectly. He was not a plaintiff, a defendant or a target. But his name and image were the issue.
The case dates back to a presidential primary debate to 2016 and Sen. Marco Rubio's mocking of candidate Trump as having "small hands."
"He hit my hands," Trump protested. "Look at these hands, are these small hands?" And, "If they're small, something else must be small. I guarantee you there's no problem. I guarantee," he said, with a knowing smirk.
Two years later, part-time Democratic activist Steve Elster applied to trademarkthe phrase "TRUMP TOO SMALL" for use on T-shirts. The Patent and Trademark office rejected the proposed mark because federal law bars trademark registration of a living person's name without his consent. The trademark office said that nothing prevents Elster or anyone else from using the phrase, but without a trademark.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit disagreed, ruling that the denial of the trademark violated Elster's free speech rights.
That argument, however, had few, if any takers at the Supreme Court Wednesday.
"The question is, is this an infringement on speech? And the answer is no," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor. "He can sell as many shirts with this [Trump Too Small] saying as he wants."
Justice Clarence Thomas made a similar point in questioning Elster's lawyer, Jonathan Taylor, who conceded that without a trademark his client can still make and market as many shirts or mugs as he wants with the emblem "Trump Too Small."
So, asked Thomas, "What speech is precisely being burdened?"
Taylor replied that Elster is being denied "important rights and benefits" that are "generally available to all trademark holders who pay the registration fee, and he is being denied that "solely because his mark expresses a message about a public figure."
In other words, the denial of the trademark means that Elster can't charge others a fee for using the phrase "Trump too small."
That prompted Justice Elena Kagan to observe that the court has repeatedly said that "as long as its not viewpoint based, government... can give benefits to some and not ... to others."
Justice Neil Gorsuch chimed in to say that "there have always been content restrictions of some kind" on trademarks. Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed, noting that "Congress thinks it's appropriate to put a restriction on people profiting off commercially appropriating someone else's name."
And Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson added that a "trademark is not about the First Amendment." It's "about source identifying and preventing consumer confusion."
And finally, there was this from Chief Justice John Roberts: "What do you do about the government's argument that you're the one undermining First Amendment values because the whole point of the trademark, of course, is preventing other people from doing the same thing. If you win a trademark for the slogan ;Trump Too Small,' other people can't use it, right?"
If that really is a problem, replied lawyer Taylor, then Congress can fix it. But he didn't say how.
Bottom line at the end of Wednesday's argument? Yes, Virginia, there ARE some things that Supreme Court justices apparently do agree on.
veryGood! (36)
Related
- Tom Brady Admits He Screwed Up as a Dad to Kids With Bridget Moynahan and Gisele Bündchen
- A transgender teen in Massachusetts says other high schoolers beat him at a party
- New To Self-Tan? I Tested and Ranked the Most Popular Self-Tanners and There’s a Clear Winner
- New To Self-Tan? I Tested and Ranked the Most Popular Self-Tanners and There’s a Clear Winner
- Sam LaPorta injury update: Lions TE injures shoulder, 'might miss' Week 11
- Applications for US jobless benefits fall to 2-month low as layoffs remain at healthy levels
- Joaquin Phoenix on 'complicated' weight loss for 'Joker' sequel: 'I probably shouldn't do this again'
- GameStop turns select locations into retro stores selling classic consoles
- Mandy Moore Captures the Holiday Vibe With These No Brainer Gifts & Stocking Stuffer Must-Haves
- A missing 13-year-old wound up in adult jail after lying about her name and age, a prosecutor says
Ranking
- College Football Playoff ranking release: Army, Georgia lead winners and losers
- George R.R. Martin slams 'House of the Dragon' changes from book, spoils Season 3
- 'King of the neighborhood:' Watch as massive alligator crosses road in North Carolina town
- Oasis adds new concerts to comeback tour due to 'phenomenal' demand
- Kid Rock tells fellow Trump supporters 'most of our left-leaning friends are good people'
- Surfer Carissa Moore was pregnant competing in Paris Olympics
- Jury selection will begin in Hunter Biden’s tax trial months after his gun conviction
- Van Zweden earned $1.5M as New York Philharmonic music director in 2022-23
Recommendation
-
The Fate of Hoda Kotb and Jenna Bush Hager's Today Fourth Hour Revealed
-
Video shows blue heron savoring large rat in New York's Central Park
-
4 confirmed dead, suspect in custody after school shooting in Georgia
-
US Interior Secretary announces restoration of the once-endangered Apache trout species in Arizona
-
Judge weighs the merits of a lawsuit alleging ‘Real Housewives’ creators abused a cast member
-
Ex-Green Beret behind failed Venezuela raid released pending trial on weapons charges
-
Maryland will participate in the IRS’s online tax filing program
-
An appeals court upholds a ruling that an online archive’s book sharing violated copyright law